The Minnesota Learning Project logo featuring the outline of Minnesota, an open book, and a North Star.

DRAFT 1.1 • September 2026 • Audience: students, parents, educators, school boards, policymakers

Student Intellectual Freedom

Schools may teach difficult and contested ideas. They should not decide for students which contested ideas they must personally believe.

The Minnesota Learning Project distinguishes teaching about an idea from teaching through one required worldview. Students should learn to describe, compare, analyze, criticize, defend, and evaluate political, economic, religious, social, moral, and philosophical ideas. Academic credit should depend on knowledge and reasoning, not ideological allegiance.

What schools may require

  • Accurately describe a political, economic, religious, social, moral, or philosophical position.
  • Compare competing explanations, frameworks, institutions, and historical outcomes.
  • Analyze primary and secondary sources and defend conclusions with evidence.
  • Participate in neutral simulations such as mock elections, hearings, debates, budget exercises, or civic problem-solving.
  • Study activism, organizing, litigation, lobbying, protest, reform, and political movements as objects of history and civic analysis.

What schools should not require for academic credit

  • Affirm or renounce a contested political, ideological, religious, moral, or identity proposition as a personal belief.
  • Organize for, advocate for, donate to, campaign for, or publicly support a political or social cause.
  • Adopt a prescribed identity category, ideological self-description, or political conclusion.
  • Disclose deeply personal beliefs, sexuality, gender identity, religion, political views, family beliefs, trauma, or similar sensitive information when a neutral educational task can be completed without that disclosure.

The rule is viewpoint-neutral.

This protection applies equally to communist, socialist, capitalist, nationalist, progressive, conservative, religious, secular, identity-based, and other contested frameworks. No viewpoint receives a special exemption from the same academic and developmental rules.

Personal disclosure

Reflection can be educationally useful, but students should have a non-disclosure alternative when a task asks for sensitive personal information that is not necessary to measure the intended competency. Safety, counseling, disability, and other legally required processes may involve different obligations and are not displaced by this draft standard.

High school: study systems comparatively

Older students should examine major political and economic systems comparatively using primary texts, institutional design, incentives, historical examples, civil-liberty consequences, stated ideals, and observed outcomes. The goal is not to shield students from controversial ideas; it is to make them capable of evaluating those ideas independently.

Status: Draft framework; not adopted law. Related: Policy Standards • Age-Appropriate Standards • Civic Mechanics.